Wednesday, July 20, 2011

amorphous solid

images amorphous solid.gif amorphous solid. Amorphous Solids
  • Amorphous Solids



  • chaks7
    01-19 04:10 PM
    My wife's co. provides health insurance for both of us. We are both on H1-B.

    If my wife quits her job, can we still be eligible for COBRA because at that point she will be doing COS to H4. If someone has any experience or knowledge about this please reply. It will help us deal things better as we are better prepared with what could be our options.

    Does COBRA depend on H1-B status? Also recently Obama administration has worked a plan where the payments on COBRA are less than the usual amounts, COBRA subsidy? Can you provide details regarding that?





    wallpaper Amorphous Solids amorphous solid. Amorphous solids.
  • Amorphous solids.



  • chanduv23
    03-14 12:07 PM
    Charles Oppenheim, Chief of Immigrant Visa Control and Reporting Division at the U.S. Department of State (DOS) was a guest speaker at a February 28, 2007 Washington D.C. Chapter meeting of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). Mr. Oppenheim was kind enough to share his office�s visa number / Visa Bulletin expectations for 2007.

    HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF RETROGRESSION

    Mr. Oppenheim discussed the historical background that has led to the current retrogression situation. Retrogression is not something new or unfamiliar in immigration law, as long-time MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers may recall. For many, however, who may have become involved in the green card process since 2001, it is new and, of course, highly problematic. Employment-based (or EB) numbers were current from 2001 through 2005 due to a legislative "fix." This legislation authorized prior, unused immigrant visa numbers from several earlier years to be recaptured and put back into the immigration system. That quota of recaptured numbers was exhausted during Fiscal Year (FY) 2005. As a result, in FYs 2005, 2006 and 2007 we have witnessed severe backlogs in the EB3 categories for all countries and, starting in FY2006, in the EB2 categories for China and India.

    PREDICTIONS FOR EB IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS

    Employment-Based First Preference / EB1

    Mr. Oppenheim stated that the employment-based first preference (EB1) category is expected to remain current for all countries of chargeability, including India and China. This is likely throughout the remainder of FY2007 (ending September 30, 2007).

    Mr. Oppenheim explained what he referred to as the �trickling effect� of unused visa numbers between EB categories. This trickling effect has resulted in the EB1 category's having remained current. The numbers in the employment-based fourth preference (EB4) and employment-based fifth preference (EB5) categories that are unused are transferred up to the EB1 category. Without this trickling affect, the EB1 category would not remain current for India and China.

    This also has an impact on EB2, as unused EB1 numbers trickle down to EB2. There are not enough numbers for India and China, however, to allow the EB2 for these two countries to become current. But it has helped to move EB2 forward for these two countries, to some extent.

    Employment-Based Second Preference / EB2

    The employment-based second preference (EB2) category is expected to remain at its current cutoff dates for nationals of India and China. These dates have been stagnant at April 22, 2005 for China and January 8, 2003 for India for a few months.

    Employment-Based Third Preference / EB3

    No forward movement is expected for the employment-based third preference (EB3) category. In fact, as predicted in the March Visa Bulletin and confirmed by Mr. Oppenheim, there is a strong possibility that the EB3 numbers that are not in the "worldwide" chargeability will further retrogress, or move backward. This is expected to occur in the summer of 2007. This backward movement is based upon excessive demand for the limited supply of visa numbers. This will adversely affect nationals of India and China.

    Double Dipping

    Another problem important to note is one of �doubling dipping� for visa numbers by some individuals. As explained by Mr. Oppenheim, if an employment-based beneficiary filed for adjustment of status in the U.S. and for consular processing overseas, that individual could acquire two visa numbers if both cases are approved. This would result in a wasted immigrant visa number. As a result of this scenario, the DOS and the USCIS are planning a system that would coordinate their visa number allocation, so that each will be aware if the other has already issued a visa number for a particular individual, to prevent waste of this kind.

    CONCLUSION

    We appreciate Mr. Oppenheim's continued willingness to address matters related to visa numbers and the Visa Bulletin. The lack of employment-based visa numbers is a source of great frustration for many and Mr. Oppenheim's predictions do not assuage that feeling. It is better to have an understanding of the reality of the situation, however, than to operate in ignorance or with unrealistic expectations. The shortage of visa numbers, once again, underscores the need for legislation in this area, to increase the numbers, change the counting of the numbers (from one per person to one per family), or to revamp the system entirely.

    This trickling effect was already discussed. It is from murthy.com .





    amorphous solid. Amorphous solid
  • Amorphous solid



  • Dhundhun
    03-18 02:10 PM
    Thanks. I'll try SSN based on AOS. If they refuse, I'll get EAD for my wife.

    SSN based on AOS did not work. Going ahead with applying for EAD as it may take years and years to get GC. There may be more such things coming in future, which may require EAD and SSN and so on - who knows. While not applying for AOS, we wanted to save US$180 of EAD and have less (useless - at that point of time) paperwork.





    2011 Amorphous solids. amorphous solid. Amorphous structure of a
  • Amorphous structure of a



  • ags123
    07-26 09:57 AM
    I recently got my Eb2 India Employment based I-485 approved. I am going to file my spouse's I-485 soon and was wondering what address I should send the forms to.

    The direct filing address says
    USCIS Chicago Lockbox

    For U.S. Postal Service (USPS) deliveries:

    USCIS
    PO Box 805887
    Chicago, IL 60680-4120

    For Express mail and courier deliveries:

    USCIS
    Attn: FBAS
    131 South Dearborn, 3rd Floor
    Chicago, IL 60603-5517


    However my attorney says we need to send it to the Nebraska Service Centre as my application was filed and approved there.

    So should my lawyer send it to the Chicago lock box or NSC? Please let me know if you have personally done this recently after the addresses changes



    more...


    amorphous solid. amorphous solid: atomic
  • amorphous solid: atomic



  • BornConfused
    07-03 09:43 AM
    I'll draw a flower and send it, how is that? After all the $$$ spent on the lawyer and this whole fiasco in general, I ain't spendin' a penny more on them:mad:



    Maybe a stinky garden weed. It's the thought that counts:D.





    amorphous solid. Picture 3, -, Amorphous solid
  • Picture 3, -, Amorphous solid



  • dbevis
    April 16th, 2004, 05:37 PM
    The first one looks like some kind of space ship cruising through space gas.



    more...


    amorphous solid. Picture 4, -, Amorphous solid
  • Picture 4, -, Amorphous solid



  • LOL123
    02-14 08:55 AM
    Thank You All for the suggestions.





    2010 Amorphous solid amorphous solid. amorphous solid.gif
  • amorphous solid.gif



  • venky08
    01-07 03:12 PM
    there is a discussion about this elsewhere in the forum. please go thru the previous threads.

    in those discussion threads, it was mentioned that after I-140 is revoked, the USCIS will send an RFE to you asking for evidence of future employment consistent with the labor certificate description. it will give you a few weeks time to respond back to the RFE.

    Then you are to send a letter from your new employer that they are promising you a job in future where you would essentially do the same job functions as described in the labor...

    if you inform the USCIS using AC 21 provision to change the job upfront, you may not get this RFE.

    hi Munna,
    thanks for your reply. you said no effect on your GC. but once I-140 with drawn then how can USCIS process 485? can you please eloborate.



    more...


    amorphous solid. of amorphous solids with
  • of amorphous solids with



  • satishku_2000
    10-05 06:49 PM
    Another important thing whole EB2 and EB3 classification is , it does not matter how much experience or educational credetials a benificiary has. The job should require it too...





    hair Amorphous structure of a amorphous solid. a glass-like amorphous solid
  • a glass-like amorphous solid



  • glus
    12-09 12:47 PM
    AP could be mailed but the applicant MUST be in the USA at the time of application.

    According to my attorney, you can re-apply for AP from outside of the U.S. and have it delivered to a local consulate. This is a response from my attorney:

    My question:
    Can one apply for AP from overseas while AOS is still pending?

    Answer from Attorney:

    If the AOS is still pending you can do it yes. You can even have AP sent to
    overseas consulate. Then it is just called PAROLE lol, as they are not
    doing it in advance. Look at the I-131 and you will see about this and
    possibilities. It should talk about it in instructions.

    Best Regards,



    more...


    amorphous solid. amorphous solid: atomic motion
  • amorphous solid: atomic motion



  • gchopefull
    10-02 02:22 PM
    I recieved a weired email update from USCIS about the I-140 after RFE documents recived, waited for two days then call the customer service # and the status on the phone said that USCIS denied the case.
    here is the case history.
    LC-Feb-2005.
    I-140 filled march 2007
    I-485/EAD filled July-2007
    EAD approved/EAD card arrived 15 Sep 2007
    I-140 RFE August 2007(A2P)
    I-140 denied 27th Sep 2007.
    my question is,
    what are the options do I have?
    my employer is talking about appeal.
    since the original I-140 is denied will the 485/EAD will get cancelled too?
    is there any way to port the LC date?
    what are the chances of appeal/approval?
    employer is in good standing(financially).
    any suggestions,input will be highly appreciated.
    thanks





    hot amorphous solid: atomic amorphous solid. as an amorphous solid.
  • as an amorphous solid.



  • jsb
    03-25 03:53 PM
    Several weeks ago, I sent two messages to Obama about immigration issues, using "contact us" link on the whitehouse.gov website. Surprisingly today (after so many days) I got an email receipt back from them. Even though their message only had a standard reply, but it looks like some one is actually reading the messages (otherwise I would have gotten a standard reply immediately).

    My suggestion to IV & everyone else here is to use this method to send out our concerns to the president. Specifically request recapture of visa numbers...add that it will help resolve the housing market problem.

    "contact us" gets so many messages everyday (which are first thoroughly cleared by security), that even standard acknowledgement takes days. I don't think your acknowledgement came after somebody read and understood your priority date or country limit immigration concerns.



    more...


    house amorphous solid. amorphous amorphous solid. an initial amorphous state
  • an initial amorphous state



  • abhijitp
    12-19 07:39 PM
    Attorney suggested to follow up with FP second time also and said we will be asked by USCIS which application to keep. Is this true?
    Not true. They won't ask you anything. I would get my FP done. Then have your attorney write a letter to the USCIS explaining why you submitted two AOS applications, then asking them to keep any one "approvable" of the two AOS applications you submitted. This, I was told by an attorney during a private consultation call. Hope this helps. Best advice is, please consult an attorney:)





    tattoo Picture 3, -, Amorphous solid amorphous solid. amorphous solid: preparation
  • amorphous solid: preparation



  • vxb2004
    11-25 07:59 PM
    vxb2004,
    Was there any LUD on ur 485 after u sent AC21 Documents in Apr?.

    KKtexas,

    I had some soft LUD's in June...but the AC21 documents were sent in June!!



    more...


    pictures Picture 4, -, Amorphous solid amorphous solid. an amorphous solid
  • an amorphous solid



  • greenguru
    04-01 04:11 PM
    EB3 Labor
    I-140
    I-485

    Then
    EB2 Labor
    I-140

    Cheers, gG





    dresses as an amorphous solid. amorphous solid. amorphous solid examples. to
  • amorphous solid examples. to



  • lazycis
    12-11 09:19 AM
    6 months according to the USCIS website



    more...


    makeup of amorphous solids with amorphous solid. amorphous solid. amorphous
  • amorphous solid. amorphous



  • sweet23guyin
    09-26 04:56 PM
    800-375-5283
    Options 1-2-2-6-2-2-1

    u need to tell them that ur app was filed around 90 days ago and u wil get transferred to an 2nd level IO. She will ask you ur full name and DOB. If she finds you in DB , she will verify ur address or mother's maiden name.

    Thanks for the info, i too got my recpt# by calling...





    girlfriend amorphous solid: preparation amorphous solid. of Amorphous Solids (Wiley
  • of Amorphous Solids (Wiley



  • arunmohan
    11-14 03:51 PM
    Thank you roseball. What is H1 COE?





    hairstyles amorphous solid: atomic motion amorphous solid. Orange amorphous solid; UV
  • Orange amorphous solid; UV



  • rajeshalex
    08-08 02:18 PM
    hmm... Was your wife carrying while the medicals submitted?
    We are also in a similar situation. But no rfe received for my wife. Anyway my background name check is pending.





    GeetaRam
    06-14 03:47 PM
    very useful link... even I didn't get why they mentioned foreign consular processing... what exactly that mean ? I also have question
    I am working with my employer from 2005 to till date. My green card was filed in EB3 cateogory with in 2007 and priority date is March 2005. Before I started working for my currently I have worked for more than 5+ years in India with real experience from companies like IBM, Knabay. My employer is ready to file my GC in EB2 category considering those experience as my current experience with him doesn't get considered if for EB2 Bachlors + 5 + years. I have BE in Computer Science + total 10 years of experience. As I hear mixed review for the same that porting between EB3 to EB2 with same employer... I am considering option to change employer but my question is. I have my I-140 approved thru current employer but my I-485 application hasn't been filed. What if my current employer revoke my I-140 can I still use the same priority date.... Please advice/help.





    at0474
    01-09 02:30 PM
    My guess:

    No change in EB2 dates for India. Slight forward movement for EB3.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment